I actually really enjoyed writing this paper. I think it was because I picked a topic that I was really passionate about, and truly having this debate in my own head. I think after doing the research and learning more about both sides I honestly did learn a compromise for the situation and that accreditation for these facilities that make money off of the animals needs to be pushed. I also came to the conclusion that I'm not going to be supporting a circus again.
I feel like it was helpful to have the Rogerian structure and to state both sides in a clear way. I think it helped ultimately shape my paper and make it clear and easy to understand. Before I actually implemented this structure the paper said what I needed it to, but not in an effective way.
Overall, I really enjoyed this paper. It was different from what I had written before and I think I learned more about having Rogerian qualities and different methods of argument/persuasion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment